In case of Homeopathy, Criticism is not good at all
for the beginners who are the students !
If those who criticize succeeded in publishing books,
they are allowed to teach Homeopathy and what do
you think that they teach ?
Dr. Hahnemann's Homeopathy ? No ! Of course they
teach their opposition to Homeopathy. You know it
too well and in that case what the students will learn?
What will they think of homeopathy ?
They are not allowed to speak about Dr. Hahneman's
experience because his ideas " are old from 200 years
ago " , the new teachers say.
I am a beginner in studying homeopathy ( 7 months)
and I can say that I am not confused about the vital
force like other physicians because I learned what is
the Universal energy in our body from other teachers
who studied all their life the energy and its influence
upon the human beings and everything.
I also learned from very good homeopathic doctors
what is the succussion !
Many doctors today ask How is possible that a
homeopathic medicine can cure a disease when the
substance doesn't contain anything from the Mother
liquid under the microscope ?
They are not able to understand the vital force in the
homeopathic medicines because they didn't study the
Energy that makes our life possible on Earth.
Maybe it should be taught in homeopathic colleges.
As a conclusion, I can say that Homeopathy can be
learned only from dr. Hahneman's Art of Medicine
which is the best in the world even if SO many
homeopaths still don't know it.
Haminia
0 comentarii:
Trimiteți un comentariu